Practitioner 2010; 254 (1729): 23-26
Borderline personality disorder often goes undetected
28 May 2010
AUTHORS
Dr Vesna Jordanova MD MSc MRCPsych
Lecturer in general adult psychiatry, Imperial College, London
Dr Paola Rossin MD
Staff grade psychiatrist, Central and North West London NHS Trust
Article
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex mental disorder characterised by mood instability, impulsivity, relationship difficulties and disturbed self-image. There is a pervasive pattern of emotional instability, impulsive aggression, repeated self-harm and chronic suicidal tendencies often associated with suicide attempts. The disorder is associated with significant impairment of psychological, social and occupational functioningwith a suicide rate of almost 10%, a rate 50 times higher than in the general population.1
BPD is a highly heterogeneous condition; the extent of the emotional and behavioural problems varies considerably. Some people with BPD are able to sustain a certain level of social and occupational functioning, while others experience a very high level of emotional distress. There is often rapid fluctuation from periods of confidence to despair, with fear of abandonment and rejection, often escalating in crises with impulsive aggression and self-harm. Psychiatric comorbidity is very common in BPD, including other types of personality disorder and alcohol and drug misuse.1
There is a striking difference between its reported prevalence in the community (1%) and its prevalence in clinical settings (10% of individuals in outpatient psychiatric clinics and 25% of psychiatric inpatients), which indicates that a large proportion of those affected with this condition are unrecognised and untreated. In primary care, the prevalence of BPD ranges from 4 to 6% of attenders.2 Women present to psychiatric services more often than men; the gender ratio is 3:1. Most people show symptoms in late adolescence or early adult life, although some may not come to the attention of psychiatric services until much later. Individuals with BPD sometimes present through the criminal justice system.
Psychoanalysts hypothesised a delay in normal psychological development, with difficulties in integrating ambivalent feelings originally aroused against a parental figure, but later manifested in other close relationships.3
The primitive defence mechanisms occurring in early childhood persist into adulthood. The new evidence indicates that BPD is not entirely related to environmental factors. A recent study of more than 40 twin pairs showed high heritability in BPD.4 One common denominator of BPD appears to be dysfunctional regulation of emotions with high sensitivity to emotional stimuli, high emotional intensity, and slow return of emotional arousal to baseline.5 Neurotransmitters have been implicated in the regulation of impulses, aggression and affect. Serotonin has been the most extensively studied of these, and it has been shown that there is an inverse relationship between serotonin levels and aggression.
BPD has attracted unfavourable descriptions; this has discouraged better understanding of this condition, and has created a stigma. Houk described BPD sufferers as ‘intractable, unruly patients who used hospitals to escape from responsibilities'.6 A UK survey of 173 psychiatrists showed that patients with BPD are perceived as ‘more difficult, attention-seeking, annoying and less deserving of care'.7 And yet, contrary to preconceived expectations, longitudinal studies have found that BPD has a good long-term prognosis.8, 9
Presentation in primary care
Two specimen case histories are shown below. Patients with BPD present at times of crisis, often following an episode of self-harm. Presentation is accompanied by a sense of urgency and anxiety, demanding immediate action by the GP. In times of crisis people with BPD use primitive defence mechanisms, such as splitting and projections. The phenomenon of splitting signifies an inability to reconcile alternative or opposing perceptions or feelings within the self or others. In clinical settings, this phenomenon may be evident in patients' polarised views of others as either idealised (i.e. all good) or devalued (i.e. all bad). Projection is the mechanism whereby one projects one's own undesirable thoughts, motivations, desires, and feelings onto someone else.
Patients have marked difficulty differentiating reality from fantasy, so health problems may be perceived as life threatening. This may result in a loss of perspective and miscommunication with the GP. They may be inclined to mistrust doctors because of previous negative experiences with carers representing parental figures. Some patients may have the unconscious need to suffer in order to expiate guilty feelings. Patients often tend to idealise any new relationship with a doctor, only to switch to feelings of denigration later, seeing themselves as neglected, rejected and abandoned to struggle with their health problems alone.
The doctor should:
- create a sense of containment by staying calm and professional
- provide very clear information to counter any elaborate fantasies about their illness
- avoid encouraging the patient to idealise them
- resist being drawn into the patient's tendencies for splitting
- not retaliate by leaving the patient to a self-fulfilling prophecy of abandonment
Making the diagnosis
Patients with suspected BPD should be referred to a psychiatrist for assessment and diagnosis. The diagnosis is made after obtaining a full history, mental state examination and maximum collateral history. Diagnosis is based on ICD-10 diagnostic criteria,10 see table 1, p25, and should take into account the following:
- social and occupational functioning
- relationship history
- coping strategies, strengths and vulnerabilities
- psychiatric comorbidity
- the need for psychological treatment, social care and support
- the needs of any dependent children
- level of risk to self and others
Risk assessment is particularly important in BPD and should include consideration of the following:
- possible triggers
- differentiation between acute and chronic risk
- is the risk general or specific?
- use of drugs and/or alcohol
- previous suicide attempts
- degree of planning
Criteria for referral to psychiatric services are listed in table 2, p25.
Treatment
Management of BPD is particularly challenging because patients have a tendency to leave psychotherapy prematurely, regress after making progress in treatment, and engender strong counter-transference feelings in those involved in their care. The principles for the management of BPD are listed in table 3, p25.
Psychological treatment
The evidence base for the effectiveness of psychotherapies for BPD is at an early stage of development. The current evidence indicates that four types of psychotherapy are effective in treating BPD. 11-14 Two forms of treatment are viewed as psychodynamic in nature, and two are considered to be cognitive behavioural. NICE recommends against the use of brief psychological interventions (less than 3 months duration) for BPD.15
The choice of psychological intervention should be based on the following patient characteristics:
- preference
- degree of severity of BPD
- motivation to change
- willingness to commit to psychotherapy
- ability to maintain psychotherapeutic boundaries
plus
- the availability of social and professional support
Psychodynamic therapies: Mentalisation based treatment (MBT) aims to improve the patient's skills in identifying his or her feelings and thoughts and those of other people as well.11 The concept is based on the idea that difficulty in mentalisation is caused by difficulties in early attachments. The longitudinal evidence is that MBT is associated with better clinical outcomes in BPD.16
Transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) is based on Kernberg's concept that excessive early aggression has led the young person to split his or her positive and negative images of him- or herself and others.12 The primary goal of TFP is to reduce symptoms and self-destructive behaviour through the modification of representation of self and others. Primary techniques are clarification, confrontation and interpretation of transference. TFP is associated with decrease in irritability, impulsivity and suicidality.17
Cognitive behaviour therapies: Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) has suggested that the core problem of people with BPD is emotional dysregulation that triggers impulsivity and relationship difficulties.13 DBT consists of skills groups, individual therapy, and phone coaching for patients. Clinical trials show that DBT results in a significant reduction in suicidal behaviour and fewer hospital admissions.18
Schema-focused therapy (SFT) is based on work by Young.14
Patients with BPD are thought to have four dysfunctional life schemas:
- detached protector
- punitive parent
- abandoned/abused child
- angry/impulsive child
Change is achieved through a range of behavioural, cognitive and experimental techniques. SFT is associated with clinically significant improvements in psychopathology and quality of life.19
Pharmacological treatment
The current evidence from randomised controlled trials does not support effectiveness of drug treatments for overall severity of BPD; antidepressants are not effective for affective dysregulation, nor can low-dose antipsychotics be advised for managing cognitive-perceptual symptoms.20
The evidence supports the use of
mood stabilisers as first-line treatments of affective symptoms. There is no evidence of benefit with polypharmacy, which should be avoided.
NICE recommends that drug treatment should not be used specifically for BPD or for individual symptoms associated with the disorder. Drug treatments should be considered in the management of comorbid conditions. For example, antidepressants may be considered if there is evidence of clear-cut depression. Short-term use of sedatives may be considered cautiously for people in a crisis, but the duration of treatment should be no longer than one week. People with BPD who do not have any comorbid disorder should be reviewed with the aim of reducing and stopping any unnecessary drug treatment.
Monitoring
The care and monitoring of patients with BPD should be tailored on the basis of individual needs and level of risk, which may involve primary, secondary or tertiary care. A number of service models have been developed in recent decades.21
Deciding the appropriate level of support involves consideration of a number of factors, including the:
- range and complexity of the patient's needs
- risk of harm posed to self and others
- extent of involvement with other statutory and non-statutory agencies.
Hospital admissions are not helpful; often they result in deterioration of the patient's condition, and should be seen as a last resort intervention to prevent suicide.
NICE recommends that community mental health (CMH) services (secondary care) should be responsible for the treatment and management of people with BPD. There are also specialist multidisciplinary teams (tertiary care) for people with personality disorders with specific expertise in the diagnosis and management of BPD. These teams provide assessment and treatment of patients with complex needs and/or high levels of risk, and also provide consultation and advice to primary and general psychiatric services.
There is currently a great flourishing of community-based organisations related to mental health services and independent organisations, some involving former service users (e.g. Borderline UK), which are structured to support patients with personality disorder with learning or vocational interventions, according to the model of social inclusion.
Conclusion
GPs play a crucial role in identifying patients who may be suffering from BPD, in referring them to CMH services or specialist teams if available in the area, and in providing continuity of care for patients with milder forms of BPD or patients who are in a more stable condition. It is fundamental that all practitioners caring for patients with BPD work together in order to understand needs and risks and to provide patients with consistent support and help.
REFERENCES
1 Skodol A, Gunderson J. The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51: 936-95
2 Moran P, Jenkins R, Tylee A, et al. The prevalence of personality disorder amongst UK primary care attenders. Acta Psych Scand 2000; 101: 1-6
3 Kernberg O. Borderline personality organisation. J Am Psychoanalytic Ass 1967; 15: 641-85
4 Torgersen S, Lygren S et al. A twin study of personality disorders. Compr Psychiatry 2000; 41: 416-25
5 Herpertz SC, Dietrich TM et al. Evidence of abnormal amygdala functioning in borderline personality disorder: a functional MRI study. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 50: 292-8
6 Houck JH. The intractable female patient. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148: 967-75
7 Lewis G, Appleby L. Personality disorder: the patients psychiatrists dislike. Br J Psychiatry 153: 44-49 (1988)
8 Zanarini M, Frankenburg F, Hennen J et al. The longitudinal course of borderline psychopathology:
6-year prospective follow-up of the phenomenology of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 274-83
9 Zanarini M, Frankenburg F, Reich D et al. The subsyndromal phenomenology of borderline personality disorder:
a 10-year follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 929-35
10 World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. WHO. Geneva. 1992
11 Bateman A, Fonagy P. Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: mentalisation-based treatment. Oxford University Press. New York. 2004
12 Kernberg O, Selzer M, Koeningsberg N et al. Psychodynamic psychotherapy of borderline patients. Basic Books. New York. 1989
13 Linehan M. Cognitive-behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press. New York. 1993
14 Young J, Klosko J, Weshaar M. Schema therapy: a practitioners guide. Guilford Press. New York. 2003
15 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Borderline personality disorder: treatment and management. CG78. NICE. London. 2009
16 Bateman A, Fonagy P. 8-year follow-up of patients treated for borderline personality disorder: mentalisation-based treatment versus treatment as usual. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:631-8
17 Clarkin J, Levy K, Lenzenweger M et al. Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 922-8
18 Linehan M, Comtois K, Murray A et al. Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavioural therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviours and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 757-66
19 Giesen-Bloo J, van Dyck R, Spinhoven S et al. Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs. transference-focused psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 649-58
20 Lieb K, Volim B, Rucker G et al. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomized trials. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 196: 4-12
21 Bateman A, Tyrer P. Services for personality disorder: organisation for inclusion. Adv Psych Treat 2004; 10: 425-33
USEFUL INFORMATION
www.personalitydisorder.org.uk provides information on geographical distribution of specialist services for personality disorders across the UK
Borderline UK is a national user-led network of people who meet the criteria for, or who have been diagnosed with, borderline personality disorder

