Jones O, Birrell F. Diagnosis and management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Practitioner 2016;260(1799):13-16
Diagnosis and management of polymyalgia rheumatica
16 Dec 2016
AUTHORS
Dr Olwyn Jones MBChB
Specialist Registrar in Rheumatology
Dr Fraser Birrell MA MB BChir PhD FRCP
Consultant & Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer in Rheumatology
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Article
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common condition in the older population. The prevalence in the over 50s is approximately 1 in 133 with a female to male ratio of 2:1. PMR is an inflammatory condition, however, the exact aetiology is still unknown. Its association with giant cell arteritis (GCA), see figure 1, above, is well recognised. Half of patients with GCA will have some PMR symptoms and up to one fifth of patients with PMR will have clinical or histological evidence of GCA. If GCA is suspected, then assessment and treatment are urgent.1
Clinical presentation
PMR symptoms develop over a matter of weeks. Typically patients will experience bilateral shoulder or pelvic girdle pain and stiffness, that is worse in the mornings. As in inflammatory joint problems the symptoms improve with activity and deteriorate with rest, but there is no joint swelling. They can be associated with other non-specific symptoms, such as low-grade fever, malaise, fatigue, low mood, poor appetite and weight loss.2
Diagnosis
There is no specific diagnostic test so the skills of the physician are paramount. It is important to make a thorough assessment before starting treatment. There is a range of other conditions that can mimic PMR (see table 1) that need to be considered and excluded through careful history, examination and the use of simple investigations.1
Diagnostic criteria have been proposed and vary slightly from one authority to another.3-6 The British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) has extracted the common points from each to form a set of core inclusion and exclusion criteria (see table 2).7 These can be used to help the clinician explore the likelihood of PMR being the diagnosis. These are purely for PMR; there are separate guidelines for GCA.8
Simple investigations can exclude some of the mimics quite quickly. Serum markers for inflammation will help guide the diagnosis and are helpful later when tapering treatment.
It is important to recognise that a small proportion of PMR patients will have normal inflammatory markers, but the usual pattern is a commensurate rise in CRP and ESR. If only the ESR is elevated, then the clinician should consider conditions such as Sjögren’s syndrome (which can also cause fatigue, but will have sicca symptoms — dryness of the eyes and/or mouth) or myeloma. As a baseline we would recommend the following investigations in all patients with suspected PMR (see box 1).
Evidence-based management
Unlike GCA there is no urgency to commence treatment for PMR.
It is preferable to be clear whether there is an alternative more likely diagnosis first rather than potentially muddying the waters by rushing in with steroids, as it is usual for patients to feel better on steroids initially whatever the underlying problem.
If PMR is the most likely diagnosis then we recommend commencing oral prednisolone 15 mg daily with PPI cover and adding bone protection at first follow-up if indicated (see Complications of treatment).
Clinical and biochemical response should then be reassessed within 2-3 weeks. The classical response to a trial of steroids is 100% improvement within 24 hours.
If there is a suboptimal response, then referral to rheumatology is recommended, unless other localising symptoms flag a more appropriate specialty, for example, change of bowel habit or haemoptysis.
The BSR guidelines for the management of PMR suggest the following regimen for dose reduction of steroids, see box 2.
This schedule is only a guide. In reality, the individual patient may need longer on each dose to allow for successful reduction.
In milder cases, or to reduce the risk of steroid-associated complications intramuscular steroids may be given instead. The guidelines suggest im depot methylprednisolone (Depot-Medrone) 120 mg every 3-4 weeks, reducing by 20 mg every 2-3 months. Although some have suggested the use of NSAIDs, especially in PMR without elevated inflammatory markers, this is not evidence-based and therefore the use of NSAIDs does not feature in the guidelines.
More recent recommendations for the management of PMR from a collaboration between the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR), were published in 2015. These suggest a broader range of starting doses of prednisolone.9 However, UK sources such as the BSR guidelines7 and NICE clinical knowledge summaries 10 recommend 15 mg and our collective experience is that this should be sufficient in treating PMR, unless there is an overwhelming clinical indication for a higher dose (e.g. weight > 100 kg).
If symptoms return and the inflammatory markers rise in a manner consistent with a PMR flare then the dose of steroids should be increased back to the previous dose. It does not usually require more than this.
If a patient is having difficulty tapering steroids then a steroid-sparing agent may be considered. This would usually be a DMARD, such as methotrexate or azathioprine, which needs to be instigated by a rheumatologist.11-15
Follow-up should be regular to assess response to treatment and monitor for complications of disease and treatment. We suggest follow-up at weeks 1-3,
week 6, then months 3, 6, 9 and 12 during the first year, in line with BSR guidance.7 Treatment duration should be 18 months on average.
Referral
Patients with a classical presentation who respond to treatment (clinically and biochemically) can be managed in primary care.
Any atypical features increase the likelihood that the underlying diagnosis is something else. It is these cases that should have an early referral to secondary care.
Likewise, if treatment is not straightforward, patients should be managed under the supervision of a rheumatologist. Examples of these circumstances are outlined in table 3.7
Complications of treatment
The many side effects of long-term steroid use are widely known. It is important to discuss these with the patient prior to initiation of treatment. The important ones to mention are bone density loss which can lead to osteoporosis and the effect on blood sugar, which can result in new diabetes or difficulty controlling pre-existing diabetes. Follow-up blood tests should include glucose and/or HbA1c. Tight control of blood sugar is required to minimise complications from diabetes.
Fracture risk should be considered in all patients who have a successful trial of steroids (i.e. at the first review). That is the decision point when the patient is committing to more than 3 months of steroid therapy, so fracture risk should be calculated at that stage, taking into account use of steroids and the patient’s other individual risk factors.
FRAX is a useful tool to guide risk stratification and can be used as part of the shared decision-making process.16 Individuals who have a high fracture risk (red zone) are recommended for treatment with bisphosphonates and vitamin D supplements, if required, without the need for a DEXA scan. Moderate risk patients (orange zone) should be referred for a DEXA scan and the FRAX score recalculated once the hip T score is available. Low-risk patients would only receive lifestyle advice and have FRAX recalculated if their risk factors change. Bisphosphonates, of course, have their own side effects and an open discussion with the individual will help both patient and doctor come to a decision about the optimal treatment strategy.
Complications of disease
As with other inflammatory conditions, PMR can flare. As mentioned above, flares can be managed by going back to the previous steroid dose and tapering at a slower rate. More than one flare may indicate the need for a steroid-sparing drug and therefore referral to a rheumatologist would be appropriate.
At diagnosis and each follow-up visit it is imperative to consider the potential for associated GCA. The patient should be asked about headaches, jaw claudication and visual disturbance.
If there is any suspicion of GCA, urgent discussion with the rheumatologist should take place that day. If there is visual loss this may require urgent discussion with the ophthalmologist, depending on the local trust protocol. Visual loss due to GCA should be treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. For more details on the management of GCA, refer to the BSR and BHPR guidelines.8
REFERENCES
1 Hakim A, Clunie G, Haq I. Oxford Handbook of Rheumatology. pp 412-13.Third edition. Oxford University Press Inc. New York, NY. 2011
2 http://www.arthritisresearchuk.org/arthritis-information/conditions/polymyalgia-rheumatica/symptoms.aspx
3 Dasgupta B, Salvarani C, Schirmer M et al. Developing classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: comparison of views from an expert panel and wider survey. J Rheumatol 2008;35(2):270-77
4 Bird HA, Leeb B, Montecucco C et al. A comparison of the sensitivity of diagnostic criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:626-29
5 Macchioni P, Boiardi L, Mariagrazia C et al. Performance of the new 2012 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: comparison with the previous criteria in a single-centre study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1190-93
6 Ozen G, Inanc N, Unal AU et al. Assessment of the new 2012 EULAR/ACR clinical classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: A prospective multicenter study. J Rheumatol 2016;43(5):893-900
7 Dasgupta B, Borg F, Hassan N et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology 2010;49(1):186-190
8 Dasgupta B, Borg F, Hassan N et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology 2010;49(8):1594-97
9 Dejaco C, Singh Y, Perel P et al. 2015 Recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1799-1807
10 https://cks.nice.org.uk/polymyalgia-rheumatica#!scenario
11 Dejaco C, Singh Y, Perel P et al. Current evidence for therapeutic interventions and prognostic factors in polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic literature review informing the 2015 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1808-17
12 Caporali R, Cimmino MA, Ferracioli G et al. Systemic Vasculitis Study Group of the Italian Society for Rheumatology. Prednisone plus methotrexate for polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;14(7)1: 93-500
13 Van der Veen M, Dinant HJ, van Booma-Frankfort C et al. Can methotrexate be used as a steroid sparing agent in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis? Ann Rheum Dis 1996;55(8):563
14 Ferraccioli G, Salaffi F, De Vita S et al. Methotrexate in polymyalgia rheumatica: preliminary results of an open, randomized study. J Rheumatol 1996;23(4):624-28
15 Nazarinia AM, Moghimi J, Toussi J. Efficacy of methotrexate in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. Koomesh 2012;14:265-270
